Back in October I wrote a piece arguing that the city was “killing its golden goose” by raising ESP gas rates. I noted that the $8 million transferred from ESP to the general fund is predicated on revenue assumptions of at least $53.3 million (because the city isn’t supposed to take more than 15% of ESP’s revenue), but that they’ve never actually hit that number.
…the city’s projections on ESP revenue the last few years have been, shall we say, optimistic. Back in FY 2009, the first year of the $8 million transfer, the budget showed an estimated $54,951,700 in ESP revenue. When actual numbers came in, however, that revenue was only $48,619,905. In FY 2010, the budget anticipated $53,210,100 in ESP revenue. When the actual numbers came in, it was only $46,209,499. That means that, as a percentage of ESP revenues, the $8 million transfer was actually 16.45% and 17.31% for those years. The budgeted revenue for FY 2011 went up to $54,549,200 — are you seeing a trend here? — and while we won’t know the actual numbers until next year, I’m willing to bet they will again fall short.
The audited numbers for FY2011 are now in, and I wish I’d gotten some takers on that bet.
According to the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report included in Monday’s Committee of the Whole agenda, ESP reported only $40.3 million in revenue for FY 2011. That’s a 12.8% decrease from the previous year’s actual revenue and a whopping 22.1% shortfall from the FY 2011 budgeted revenue. For the visually inclined, here’s a chart of the last few years’ budgeted versus actual revenue.
That decline could charitably be called a “train wreck.” But don’t worry! Next year will be better, they assure us. According to the CAFR:
Fiscal year 2012 revenues of $54.6 million are budgeted higher than the previous year. ESP budgets with anticipation of a normal winter; however, actual revenues fluctuate with the cost of gas and weather patterns.
Of course, FY 2012′s winter is currently underway, and I’m not sure anyone would describe it as “normal.” January was the nation’s fourth warmest on record. With temperatures frequently in the 70s, we’ve been opening the windows at our house most days. That doesn’t bode well for ESP’s revenue flow.
ESP’s transfer to the General Fund is budgeted to remain at $8 million. The transfer is within the City Council adopted financial planning policy that permits a transfer of up to 15 percent of budget revenues.
You got that? As long as we keep the budgeted revenue above $53.3 million, we can keep skimming off $8 million for the general fund and still be in compliance with city policy. Meanwhile the actual revenue is in apparent free fall.


4 comments
LM says:
Feb 19, 2012
loading...
Sounds like what Ross Perot called “fuzzy math”. The city did the same thing with airport noise level extrapolation back in the early 1990′s. So much for “the numbers don’t lie”, eh?
Nancy says:
Feb 20, 2012
loading...
Dick Barker, fuzzy number expert.
extrapolation = fudged to get the desired result
Johnny D says:
Feb 22, 2012
loading...
This is just another sneaky lie the City Government is perpetrating on the electorate in Pensacola. Just like all the BS with the Baseball Stadium, just like every other sneaky behind the scenes garbage they pull.
I suppose the employees selling drugs out of the city work truck recently arrested are some of the over achievers that Wayward Hayward was talking about when he gave everyone bonuses.
Now we have this branding non-sense going on. The chamber is working on an area brand, now we have a new County Public Information Officer working on a brand and Hayward is sending OUR TAX DOLLARS OUT OF PENSACOLA to create yet ANOTHER brand. Jeeze don’t these idiots talk to each other? Don’t these fools see the advantage of working together and pooling resources.
It is my personal mission to tell everyone I can reach, then ask them to tell everyone they can reach all the reasons why we should vote EVERYONE OUT who comes up for election.
Nancy says:
Feb 22, 2012
loading...
And Monday’s lesson was about the total ad valorem tax base compared to the deficits in the pension . Uh oh, again.